About OpenKnowledge@NAU | For NAU Authors

Testing the Link between Functional Diversity and Ecosystem Functioning in a Minnesota Grassland Experiment

Clark, Christopher M. and Flynn, Dan F. B. and Butterfield, Bradley J. and Reich, Peter B. (2012) Testing the Link between Functional Diversity and Ecosystem Functioning in a Minnesota Grassland Experiment. PLoS ONE, 1/11/2 (1/5/20). 1/5/2015 21:49:41. ISSN 1932-6203

[img]
Preview
Text
Clark_C_etal_2012_testing_link_between_funtional_diversity.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Publisher’s or external URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052821

Abstract

The functional diversity of a community can influence ecosystem functioning and reflects assembly processes. The large number of disparate metrics used to quantify functional diversity reflects the range of attributes underlying this concept, generally summarized as functional richness, functional evenness, and functional divergence. However, in practice, we know very little about which attributes drive which ecosystem functions, due to a lack of field-based tests. Here we test the association between eight leading functional diversity metrics (Rao's Q, FD, FDis, FEve, FDiv, convex hull volume, and species and functional group richness) that emphasize different attributes of functional diversity, plus 11 extensions of these existing metrics that incorporate heterogeneous species abundances and trait variation. We assess the relationships among these metrics and compare their performances for predicting three key ecosystem functions (above- and belowground biomass and light capture) within a long-term grassland biodiversity experiment. Many metrics were highly correlated, although unique information was captured in FEve, FDiv, and dendrogram-based measures (FD) that were adjusted by abundance. FD adjusted by abundance outperformed all other metrics in predicting both above- and belowground biomass, although several others also performed well (e.g. Rao's Q, FDis, FDiv). More generally, trait-based richness metrics and hybrid metrics incorporating multiple diversity attributes outperformed evenness metrics and single-attribute metrics, results that were not changed when combinations of metrics were explored. For light capture, species richness alone was the best predictor, suggesting that traits for canopy architecture would be necessary to improve predictions. Our study provides a comprehensive test linking different attributes of functional diversity with ecosystem function for a grassland system.

Item Type: Article
ID number or DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052821
Keywords: Biodiversity; BIOTIC communities; community assembly rules; dissimilarity; ECOLOGICAL heterogeneity; Ecology; indexes; MINNESOTA; multiple traits; PLANT diversity; productivity; species richness; trait diversity; unified approach
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
NAU Depositing Author Academic Status: Faculty/Staff
Department/Unit: College of Engineering, Forestry, and Natural Science > Biological Sciences
Date Deposited: 03 Jan 2018 19:16
URI: http://openknowledge.nau.edu/id/eprint/1733

Actions (login required)

IR Staff Record View IR Staff Record View

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year