About OpenKnowledge@NAU | For NAU Authors

Re-Evaluating Causal Modeling with Mantel Tests in Landscape Genetics

Cushman, Samuel A. and Wasserman, Tzeidle N. and Landguth, Erin L. and Shirk, Andrew J. (2013) Re-Evaluating Causal Modeling with Mantel Tests in Landscape Genetics. Diversity (14242818), 5 (1). pp. 51-72. ISSN 1424-2818

[img]
Preview
Text
Cushman_SA_etal_2013_Re-evaluating_causal_modeling_with_mantel_test_in_landscape_genetics.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
Publisher’s or external URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/d5010051

Abstract

The predominant analytical approach to associate landscape patterns with gene flow processes is based on the association of cost distances with genetic distances between individuals. Mantel and partial Mantel tests have been the dominant statistical tools used to correlate cost distances and genetic distances in landscape genetics. However, the inherent high correlation among alternative resistance models results in a high risk of spurious correlations using simple Mantel tests. Several refinements, including causal modeling, have been developed to reduce the risk of affirming spurious correlations and to assist model selection. However, the evaluation of these approaches has been incomplete in several respects. To demonstrate the general reliability of the causal modeling approach with Mantel tests, it must be shown to be able to correctly identify a wide range of landscape resistance models as the correct drivers relative to alternative hypotheses. The objectives of this study were to (1) evaluate the effectiveness of the originally published causal modeling framework to support the correct model and reject alternative hypotheses of isolation by distance and isolation by barriers and to (2) evaluate the effectiveness of causal modeling involving direct competition of all hypotheses to support the correct model and reject all alternative landscape resistance models. We found that partial Mantel tests have very low Type II error rates, but elevated Type I error rates. This leads to frequent identification of support for spurious correlations between alternative resistance hypotheses and genetic distance, independent of the true resistance model. The frequency in which this occurs is directly related to the degree of correlation between true and alternative resistance models. We propose an improvement based on the relative support of the causal modeling diagnostic tests.

Item Type: Article
Publisher’s Statement: Creative Commons Attribution License.
ID number or DOI: 10.3390/d5010051
Keywords: causal modeling; CAUSAL models; CDPOP; Gene Flow; GENETIC research; HYPOTHESIS; landscape genetics; Mantel test; simulation; SIMULATION methods & models
Subjects: Q Science > Q Science (General)
S Agriculture > SD Forestry
NAU Depositing Author Academic Status: Faculty/Staff
Department/Unit: College of Engineering, Forestry, and Natural Science > School of Forestry
Date Deposited: 30 Sep 2015 18:57
URI: http://openknowledge.nau.edu/id/eprint/561

Actions (login required)

IR Staff Record View IR Staff Record View

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year