Forest-floor treatments in Arizona ponderosa pine restoration ecosystems: No short-term effects on plant communities

Abella, S.R. and Covington, W.W. (2007) Forest-floor treatments in Arizona ponderosa pine restoration ecosystems: No short-term effects on plant communities. Western North American Naturalist, 67 (1). pp. 120-132. ISSN 1527-0904

Preview

Text Abella_SR_EtAl_2007_Forest_Floor_Treatments(1).pdf Download (809kB) | Preview

Abstract

Leaf litter accumulation during fire exclusion and increases in tree density in postsettlement southwestern Pinus ponderosa forests may limit the establishment of understory vegetation. We performed an experiment in P. ponderosa forests of northern Arizona to ascertain plant community responses to forest-floor scarification and Oi removal on thirty-six 100-m2 plots overlaid on an existing ecological restoration experiment that involved tree thinning and prescribed burning. Constrasting with findings from many other forest types, forest-floor treatments had no effect on community diversity or composition during the 2-year experiment. Sorensen similarities were as high as 97% between posttreatment years within treatments; and successional vectors also provided little indication that treatments may appreciably affect longer-term successional trajectories. Lack of response to these fairly drastic treatments is surprising given these forests' exceptionally heavy Oi horizons and large proportions of conifer litter. Apparently shading, belowground competition for water or nutrients, or other tree-associated factors more strongly limit understory communities than does leaf litter. Based on sparse A-horizon seed banks averaging <300 seeds - m2 and limited aboveground vegetation, we hypothesize that seed shortages, particularly for native perennials. also partly precluded a treatment response. Because extensive unvegetated areas at these restoration sites may be colonized by exotics, conservative management strategies could include testing the seeding or outplanting of desirable native species as an option for filling unoccupied microsites. Reporting of "no treatment effect" experiments such as this one is important to avoid biasing meta-analyses, as is future research to clarify combinations of factors limiting understory communities. Increased understanding of these limiting factors may lead to identification of other treatments that promote recovery of native species during ecological restoration in this region.

Item Type:	Article
ID number or DOI:	10.3398/1527-0904(2007)67[120:FTIAPP]2.0.CO;2
Keywords:	Understory, Litter, Flora, Seeding, Species richness, Diversity, ERI Library
Subjects:	G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences S Agriculture > SD Forestry
NAU Depositing Author Academic Status:	Faculty/Staff
Department/Unit:	Research Centers > Ecological Restoration Institute
Date Deposited:	16 Feb 2016 23:48
URI:	http://openknowledge.nau.edu/id/eprint/1438

Actions (login required)

IR Staff Record View

Downloads